<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should Microsoft iterate?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tech.lkrms.org/should-microsoft-iterate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tech.lkrms.org/should-microsoft-iterate/</link>
	<description>just a nerd with &#34;mild OCD tendencies&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh Marshall		</title>
		<link>https://tech.lkrms.org/should-microsoft-iterate/#comment-579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 04:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lkrms.org/?p=831#comment-579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I perceive the problem to be that Microsoft can&#039;t break out of the mentality of catering mainly to business, which requires road maps, feature checklists, etc, so now they&#039;re trying to cater to the consumer market in the same way.
Apple&#039;s secrecy works against them in business, but builds massive levels of hype on the consumer side.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I perceive the problem to be that Microsoft can&#8217;t break out of the mentality of catering mainly to business, which requires road maps, feature checklists, etc, so now they&#8217;re trying to cater to the consumer market in the same way.<br />
Apple&#8217;s secrecy works against them in business, but builds massive levels of hype on the consumer side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
